Otpvondoiats commented on PR #18266: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18266#issuecomment-3845172446
> @Otpvondoiats please take a look for example here #18171 there is a clear example on how the time 64s before change and 25s after change improves things by ~2.5x factor. Very short but enough to prove the numbers. > > Descriptions dont have to be long but on point. I know you as the author know all of the details, but it is also good habit and skill to present the details to others. This really can help everyone in understanding changes introduced. Especially the changes are breaking and not marked described and discussed properly too. > > Marking breaking changes here are very important because we all are tired of everything changing and have no stable tools to work with. We want NuttX to provide such self-compatible stable and reliable environment. It is author responsibility to prove that presented improvement is worth breaking project for everyone else. > > We need to find a common language and working methods please. I have some questions regarding the specific power saving data and logs you requested. Are you familiar with the sensor framework? Do you know where its power consumption occurs? I answered this question above: the specific power consumption data depends on your application scenario. Do you know how much power consumption the new Xiaomi Watch 5, with its large-core Android and small-core MCU chip, consumes after the small core wakes up the large core? I can tell you about a bug: when the small core continuously wakes up the large core, the device's standby time drops from 4-5 days to less than 16 hours. Do I need to post all these testing and verification procedures for you? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
