GUIDINGLI commented on PR #3397: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3397#issuecomment-3845303854
> @xiaoxiang781216 I'm not against AI. This is just tool like any other. I've been using AI for years for various tasks and I know it sucks for osdev tasks. Most important, anything AI produces must be checked and verified by a human so we can avoid what I call "AI garbage". The longer the output from AI, the more difficult it is for a human to verify. First, Agree with your point: AI produces must be checked and verified by a human. Then, That is right you said these .md are "garbage" testing/sched/rwsem_test/RWSEM_TEST_COVERAGE.md testing/sched/rwsem_test/RWSEM_TEST_SUMMARY.md testing/sched/rwsem_test/RWSEM_TEST_SUMMARY.md But not all of them. Let's check the real code to say whether it is "garbage". testing/sched/rwsem_test/rwsem_comprehensive_test.c Use posix APIs and can pass on Linux, then this case can check NuttX API and can become the official testcase. Then why it is "garbage" ? The cases generated by AI are more rigorous than those written by engineers in some scenarios. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
