xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #19061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/19061#discussion_r3375266296


##########
sched/misc/assert.c:
##########
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ static int assert_tracecallback(FAR struct usbtrace_s 
*trace, FAR void *arg)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_STACKDUMP

Review Comment:
   yes, I think so. so, should we just keep one Kconfig? the basic stack info 
should be always printed, but the stack content is printed only Kconfig is 
enabled.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to