zzby0 commented on PR #19741: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/19741#issuecomment-5227412117
> @zzby0 please analyze merging with: #19737 I suggest using cpufreq name because it is used on Linux and other OSes. Thanks for the comment ! Linux has both cpufreq and devfreq, but due to legacy issues, devfreq is incompatible with cpufreq. However, Nuttx doesn't have these legacy issues; the CPU can be used as a device and is compatible with devfreq, meaning we only need to maintain one framework. In this case, devfreq may be more suitable. I'd appreciate your suggestions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
