xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #21305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/21305#issuecomment-6578829767

   > > > > > > > What? No, this family name is again wrong. Official naming 
convention of Infineon is tc3x and tc4x, there is no "xx". I wanted to review, 
but when I checked now it's already merged.
   > > > > > > > Why there is not enough time given for review at all 
@xiaoxiang781216 @acassis ? Not everyone is working over the weekend!
   > > > > > > > NACK for these from my side!
   > > > > > > 
   > > > > > > 
   > > > > > > The official document name tc4xx too: 
https://documentation.infineon.com/aurixtc4xx/docs/ukk1718002103459. tc4xx or 
tc4x should be fine.
   > > > > > 
   > > > > > 
   > > > > > NACK! I confirmed this with Infineon when we worked for Zephyr 
Port 
[zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#107516](https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/107516).
 The officail naming is tc3x and tc4x. It's not yet fully reflected in all the 
places of Infineon sources and pages.
   > > > > 
   > > > > 
   > > > > if you think tc3x/tc4x is better than tc3xx/tc4xx, please create 
patch renaming it. @parthitce
   > > > 
   > > > 
   > > > #19041 was already addressing it and plan is to split. Yes, we can 
again rebase the cahnges and send another PR. But my question remains, why 
there is not enough time given for review?
   > > 
   > > 
   > > It isn't just rebased. I said many time from June that you need split 
the huge PR into small and reviewable pr, otherwise nobody could review and 
approve your change. Why do you request the maintainer take time to review the 
poor-quality PR (one PR contain 15000+ lines change)? For example, #21039 is 
reviewed and merged quickly.
   > 
   > Split is agreed and I asked until this week to clear it. But you haven't 
answered my question.
   > 
   > Why there is not enough time given for review of this PR?
   
   For simple change like this (rename without changing functionality), one day 
is enough.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to