patacongo commented on issue #3898: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/3898#issuecomment-859165177
> > > posix_spawn(exec...) need remove this special insertion to confirm standard. But how to handle other similar but NuttX specific function(e.g. task_spawn, task_create...)? Changing to the same convention, or keep it as before but complicate the implementation and confuse people? They cannot follow the same convention because there is no file name associated with task, only an entry point. So it cannot work exactly the same way. Something similar could be down like make argv[0] the task name, but that is kind of redundant. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
