gustavonihei commented on pull request #4233: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/4233#issuecomment-887726983
> > Board-specific IOCs do not need to be shared. They are private. Shared IOCs are not board-specific, There can be no discussion of sharing private things. > > Yes, if the booloader is for a specific board, we don't need the public interface. The bootloader and board code can use any adhoc protocol to finish the work. @patacongo I believe now I understand the root of your concern. The motivation for defining a new `boardctl` command is due to it being, to my knowledge, one of the most consolidated means for the application to trigger chip-level actions without hurting the OS architecture. > But, I suppose @gustavonihei want to write a general bootloader which could work with all NuttX board. @xiaoxiang781216 Indeed, I am in the process of integrating support for [MCUboot](https://github.com/mcu-tools/mcuboot), which is a platform-agnostic secure bootloader already supported by several RTOSes. Besides the already merged https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/4166, this PR here is the only change/addition required to the OS interface. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
