pkarashchenko commented on a change in pull request #5526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5526#discussion_r808866316
##########
File path: net/tcp/tcp_send_buffered.c
##########
@@ -1053,6 +1053,15 @@ ssize_t psock_tcp_send(FAR struct socket *psock, FAR
const void *buf,
ssize_t result = 0;
bool nonblock;
int ret = OK;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_LONG_LONG
+ uint64_t expire;
+ uint64_t remain;
+ uint64_t current;
+#else
+ clock_t expire;
+ clock_t remain;
+ clock_t current;
+#endif
Review comment:
Yes. I understand this, but since it is compared against `UINT_MAX` I do
not think that there is a need for `uint64_t`. Or I'm missing something?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
