takumiando commented on issue #7089: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/7089#issuecomment-1247459240
@xiaoxiang781216 Thank you for your kind explanation! I understand your idea. But many internal RTC lower-half drivers are enabled with each ```up_rtc_xxx()``` implementations at the same time. For example: ```/arch/arm/src/stm32/Make.defs``` ``` ifeq ($(CONFIG_STM32_RTC),y) CHIP_CSRCS += stm32_rtc.c ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTC_ALARM),y) CHIP_CSRCS += stm32_exti_alarm.c endif ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTC_PERIODIC),y) CHIP_CSRCS += stm32_exti_wakeup.c endif ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTC_DRIVER),y) CHIP_CSRCS += stm32_rtc_lowerhalf.c endif endif ``` In this case, I think that ```stm32_rtc.c```(```up_rtc_xxx()``` implementations) and ```arch_rtc.c``` are conflicts because of same function names. Should I modify each ```Make.defs``` to build only lower-half drivers and ```arch_rtc.c```? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
