gregory-nutt commented on code in PR #10602: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/10602#discussion_r1324969904
########## include/stdio.h: ########## @@ -244,6 +244,11 @@ int dprintf(int fd, FAR const IPTR char *fmt, ...) printf_like(2, 3); int vdprintf(int fd, FAR const IPTR char *fmt, va_list ap) printf_like(2, 0); +/* Custom stream operation fopencookie. */ + +FAR FILE *fopencookie(FAR void *cookie, FAR const char *mode, + cookie_io_functions_t io_funcs); + Review Comment: It is prohibited to add non-standard interfaces to the OS. We are purely standards based and non-standard, ad hoc OS interfaces are generally prohibited. Hmm... I see that Linux does support this interface: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/fopencookie.3.html .. Is that a sufficient justification? The man page lists only GNU as the justification for the interface. That would not have been accepted in the past, but an objective to have Linux compatibility has crept into our project mindset recently. So maybe this is okay for that reason. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org