[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14001942#comment-14001942
]
Rishi Verma edited comment on OODT-693 at 5/19/14 4:06 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hey Lewis,
Thanks for setting this issue up, I agree it is important to keep the logging
framework consistent.
I might add that there's also extensive use of java.util.logging throughout
OODT. I'm preferential to this library only because I've used it so
extensively. It might be worth bringing this topic up on the dev forums, to get
some input on what the community thinks of a desired logging framework to
refactor to?
Thanks,
rishi
was (Author: riverma):
Hey Lewis,
Thanks for setting this issue up, I agree it is important to keep the logging
framework consistent.
I might add that there's also extensive use of java.util.logging throughout
OODT. I'm preferential to this library only because I've used it so
extensively. It might be worth bringing this topic up on the dev forums, to get
some input on what the community thinks of a desired logging framework to
refactor to?
Thanks,
rsihi
> Consolidate logging in OODT
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: OODT-693
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-693
> Project: OODT
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: file manager
> Affects Versions: 0.6
> Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
> Fix For: 0.8
>
>
> Right now we seem to be using an array of inconsistent logging frameworks.
> Personally I really like the Slf4j over Log4j setup. Extremely easy to work
> with, easy to configure and Log4j 2.X is dynamite so if we can implement that
> then we are laughing.
> This is by no means a trivial task.
> It is however an important one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
