shoothzj commented on PR #4988: URL: https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/4988#issuecomment-2287226504
@Xuanwo @tisonkun I hope that in the end we use the following naming convention: ``` <module>opendal-spring</module> <module>opendal-spring-starter</module> <module>opendal-spring-starter-reactive</module> ``` Reasons: 1. Indeed, `opendal-spring-starter` would be more suitable for third parties. `spring-starter-opendal` might lead users to expect version management aligned with Spring. 2. As for `opendal-spring-starter` or `opendal-spring-data-starter`, I believe the `data` part is unnecessary. Spring Data is a sub-project of Spring, and we currently do not have that kind of relationship. Let me know if there's anything wrong. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
