flaneur2020 commented on PR #6366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/opendal/pull/6366#issuecomment-3706646039

   > Do you still need a `FoyerLayer`, or should we instead use `CacheLayer` + 
`foyer service` ?
   
   there was a discussion around this in 
https://github.com/apache/opendal/issues/7107#issuecomment-3696663141
   
   imo we could introduce a concrete FoyerLayer first to meet the concrete 
requirements at the moment without being blocked too long for reaching 
consensus on designing abstractions, and then we could let `FoyerLayer` into an 
alias for `CacheLayer`, this should be a smooth transistion for users.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to