Author: buildbot
Date: Sat Sep 21 09:39:37 2013
New Revision: 879309
Log:
Staging update by buildbot for openoffice
Modified:
websites/staging/openoffice/trunk/content/ (props changed)
websites/staging/openoffice/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.html
Propchange: websites/staging/openoffice/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Sat Sep 21 09:39:37 2013
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1520431
+1525211
Modified:
websites/staging/openoffice/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/openoffice/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.html
(original)
+++ websites/staging/openoffice/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.html
Sat Sep 21 09:39:37 2013
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ unnecessary and unproductive. We have a
change would be uncontroversial, and the change is reversible, then the
default approach is to go ahead make the change.</p>
</li>
<li>
-<p>Terms that you might related to the above are: <a
href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=JFDI";>JFDI</a> and
"assuming lazy consensus".</p>
+<p>Terms that you might need to know related to the above are: <a
href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=JFDI";>JFDI</a> and
"assuming lazy consensus".</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>However, there are times where CTR is not appropriate and RTC is used.
This happens, for example, at the end of a release cycle, when we want to
carefully review
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ changes made to the product, in order to
on the mailing list.</p>
</li>
<li>
-<p>A Committer can also voluntarily invocate a RTC on their own changes. For
example the Committer might be considering a change that of greater
significance. Maybe he would
+<p>A Committer can also voluntarily invocate a RTC on their own changes. For
example the Committer might be considering a change that is of greater
significance. Maybe he would
value additional input, or technical review. Maybe the change is
controversial or require coordination. If CTR is not appropriate then one can
make a proposal and send it to
the dev mailing list. </p>
</li>
