Author: mseidel
Date: Tue Aug 22 22:41:15 2017
New Revision: 1805835

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1805835&view=rev
Log:
Fixed typo in link

Modified:
    openoffice/site/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.mdtext

Modified: openoffice/site/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/site/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.mdtext?rev=1805835&r1=1805834&r2=1805835&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- openoffice/site/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.mdtext (original)
+++ openoffice/site/trunk/content/orientation/decision-making.mdtext Tue Aug 22 
22:41:15 2017
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ In the previous Module we read about col
     We trust our Committers to do the right thing. By default Committers don't 
ask permission before acting. They avoid unnecessary discussion and email 
traffic. This is not because they are anti-social. This is because they realize 
that in a project of this size it is impossible to discuss every small change 
in advance. Discussing too much is both 
     unnecessary and unproductive. We have a "time machine" called Subversion 
that allows us to undo any changes to the product or website. So if a Committer 
believes that a     change would be uncontroversial, and the change is 
reversible, then the default approach is to go ahead make the change.
 
-    Terms that you might need to know related to the above are: 
[JFDI](http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=JFDI) and ["assuming lazy 
consensus"](.http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus).
+    Terms that you might need to know related to the above are: 
[JFDI](http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=JFDI) and ["assuming lazy 
consensus"](https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus).
 
   2. When is RTC, Review-Then-Commit Used?
 


Reply via email to