This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

git-site-role pushed a commit to branch preview/missing-pictures-staging
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice-project.git


The following commit(s) were added to 
refs/heads/preview/missing-pictures-staging by this push:
     new 65c0a92  Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot
65c0a92 is described below

commit 65c0a92cb73e40875167605f9d92edcf7ded559e
Author: buildbot <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sat Jun 10 05:17:26 2023 +0000

    Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot
---
 output/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache.html         |  14 +++++++-------
 output/feeds/all-en.atom.xml                            |  14 +++++++-------
 output/feeds/blog.atom.xml                              |  14 +++++++-------
 .../blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png      | Bin 0 -> 15434 bytes
 .../blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png    | Bin 0 -> 10395 bytes
 .../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png  | Bin 0 -> 18039 bytes
 .../blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png   | Bin 0 -> 8719 bytes
 .../75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads.png     | Bin 0 -> 26162 bytes
 .../blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png   | Bin 0 -> 15434 bytes
 .../blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png     | Bin 0 -> 10169 bytes
 10 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/output/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache.html 
b/output/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache.html
index e377d43..eedd3aa 100644
--- a/output/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache.html
+++ b/output/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache.html
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ planning. <br/></p>
 <p>First a scatter plot of daily download numbers, with a 7-day moving average 
overlay.&nbsp; Each of our releases is marked by a vertical line.&nbsp; You can 
clearly see the increase in interest since the release of Apache OpenOffice 
4.0.<br/></p>
 <p><br/></p>
 <p><br/></p>
-<p align="center"> <img alt="daily-downloads.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/4618df3f-c9b3-4be0-a00a-268b509ffb9c"/></p>
+<p align="center"> <img alt="daily-downloads.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png"/></p>
 <p> </p>
 <p align="left"> </p><br/>
 <p> </p>
@@ -229,20 +229,20 @@ planning. <br/></p>
 <p>Another approach is to look at which localized versions of Apache 
OpenOffice were downloaded.&nbsp; We can see these trends in the following dot 
chart:</p>
 <p> </p>
 <p> </p>
-<p align="center"><img alt="languages.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/c15b2b83-aaf7-45ec-b77c-5ac3b2325ed7"/></p>
+<p align="center"><img alt="languages.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png"/></p>
 <p>We can also look at the trend over time of downloads by operating 
system.&nbsp;&nbsp; (Note the log-scale on the Y-axis.)&nbsp; OpenOffice is a 
mainstream open source desktop application, so the OS distribution reflects 
overall desktop operating system market shares:<br/></p>
-<p align="center"><img alt="os-downloads.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/08e0a258-dd27-48a7-9a86-750a572bca7b"/></p>
+<p align="center"><img alt="os-downloads.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads_64-bit.png"/></p>
 <p>Since we have Linux versions of OpenOffice packed as RPMs (e.g., for 
RedHat) as well as DEBs (e.g., for Ubuntu), we can look for trends in the ratio 
of requests for these two packaging formats over time:<br/></p>
-<p align="center"> <img alt="packaging.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/f5304e3b-e508-4112-9ae2-6cbfdb55a890"/></p>
+<p align="center"> <img alt="packaging.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png"/></p>
 <p> </p>
 <p>Also, we have 32-bit and 64-bit Linux downloads, and we see a gradual 
increase in demand over time for the 64-bit version, now reaching 50%.&nbsp; 
(The drop in July-September is not fully explained, but may have been an error 
in our download page that was not recommending 64-bit downloads 
appropriately.)<br/></p>
-<p align="center"> <img alt="64-bit.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/ee577c6b-74ca-472a-b698-b8488748e0dd"/></p>
+<p align="center"> <img alt="64-bit.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png"/></p>
 <p> </p>
 <p>Although we don't have detailed download data for different Windows 
versions (we have a single download for all Windows users) we do have 
information from website visitors (nearly 7 million visitors per month) that 
tells a similar story.&nbsp; Windows 7 remains the most popular Windows version 
for our users, accounting for over half of Windows visitors.&nbsp; Windows XP 
ties with Windows 8 for second place, though Windows XP usage is declining 
quickly.<br/></p>
 <p> </p>
-<p align="center"><img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/f757dc34-3085-4446-8fd7-d339b762f591"/></p>
+<p align="center"><img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png"/></p>
 <p>Looking at the similar data for web browsers, we see the rise in Chrome 
users among our website visitors:<br/></p>
-<p align="center"><img alt="browsers.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/fbeef3f1-467b-46ec-bfda-355187d97d39"/></p>
+<p align="center"><img alt="browsers.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png"/></p>
 <p> </p><br/>
 <p> </p>
 <p>The above charts were made in <a href="http://www.r-project.org/";>R</a>, 
using data from <a 
href="http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Download%20Stats%20API/";>SourceForge's
 REST API</a> and from Google Analytics.&nbsp;&nbsp; The processing of the 
SourceForge data was automated via a <a 
href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/detail-by-day.py";>custom
 Python script</a>.<br/></p>
diff --git a/output/feeds/all-en.atom.xml b/output/feeds/all-en.atom.xml
index b4f13ab..7451059 100644
--- a/output/feeds/all-en.atom.xml
+++ b/output/feeds/all-en.atom.xml
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ planning. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;First a scatter plot of daily download numbers, with a 7-day moving 
average overlay.&amp;nbsp; Each of our releases is marked by a vertical 
line.&amp;nbsp; You can clearly see the increase in interest since the release 
of Apache OpenOffice 4.0.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="daily-downloads.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/4618df3f-c9b3-4be0-a00a-268b509ffb9c"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="daily-downloads.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p align="left"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
@@ -1275,20 +1275,20 @@ planning. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Another approach is to look at which localized versions of Apache 
OpenOffice were downloaded.&amp;nbsp; We can see these trends in the following 
dot chart:&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="languages.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/c15b2b83-aaf7-45ec-b77c-5ac3b2325ed7"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="languages.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;We can also look at the trend over time of downloads by operating 
system.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Note the log-scale on the Y-axis.)&amp;nbsp; 
OpenOffice is a mainstream open source desktop application, so the OS 
distribution reflects overall desktop operating system market 
shares:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="os-downloads.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/08e0a258-dd27-48a7-9a86-750a572bca7b"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="os-downloads.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads_64-bit.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Since we have Linux versions of OpenOffice packed as RPMs (e.g., for 
RedHat) as well as DEBs (e.g., for Ubuntu), we can look for trends in the ratio 
of requests for these two packaging formats over time:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="packaging.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/f5304e3b-e508-4112-9ae2-6cbfdb55a890"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="packaging.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Also, we have 32-bit and 64-bit Linux downloads, and we see a gradual 
increase in demand over time for the 64-bit version, now reaching 
50%.&amp;nbsp; (The drop in July-September is not fully explained, but may have 
been an error in our download page that was not recommending 64-bit downloads 
appropriately.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="64-bit.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/ee577c6b-74ca-472a-b698-b8488748e0dd"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="64-bit.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Although we don't have detailed download data for different Windows 
versions (we have a single download for all Windows users) we do have 
information from website visitors (nearly 7 million visitors per month) that 
tells a similar story.&amp;nbsp; Windows 7 remains the most popular Windows 
version for our users, accounting for over half of Windows visitors.&amp;nbsp; 
Windows XP ties with Windows 8 for second place, though Windows XP usage is 
declining quickly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/f757dc34-3085-4446-8fd7-d339b762f591"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Looking at the similar data for web browsers, we see the rise in 
Chrome users among our website visitors:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="browsers.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/fbeef3f1-467b-46ec-bfda-355187d97d39"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="browsers.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;The above charts were made in &lt;a 
href="http://www.r-project.org/"&gt;R&lt;/a&gt;, using data from &lt;a 
href="http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Download%20Stats%20API/"&gt;SourceForge's
 REST API&lt;/a&gt; and from Google Analytics.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The 
processing of the SourceForge data was automated via a &lt;a 
href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/detail-by-day.py"&gt;custom
 Python script&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
diff --git a/output/feeds/blog.atom.xml b/output/feeds/blog.atom.xml
index 1f7f845..fd61bb4 100644
--- a/output/feeds/blog.atom.xml
+++ b/output/feeds/blog.atom.xml
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ planning. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;First a scatter plot of daily download numbers, with a 7-day moving 
average overlay.&amp;nbsp; Each of our releases is marked by a vertical 
line.&amp;nbsp; You can clearly see the increase in interest since the release 
of Apache OpenOffice 4.0.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="daily-downloads.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/4618df3f-c9b3-4be0-a00a-268b509ffb9c"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="daily-downloads.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p align="left"&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
@@ -1275,20 +1275,20 @@ planning. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Another approach is to look at which localized versions of Apache 
OpenOffice were downloaded.&amp;nbsp; We can see these trends in the following 
dot chart:&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="languages.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/c15b2b83-aaf7-45ec-b77c-5ac3b2325ed7"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="languages.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;We can also look at the trend over time of downloads by operating 
system.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Note the log-scale on the Y-axis.)&amp;nbsp; 
OpenOffice is a mainstream open source desktop application, so the OS 
distribution reflects overall desktop operating system market 
shares:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="os-downloads.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/08e0a258-dd27-48a7-9a86-750a572bca7b"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="os-downloads.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads_64-bit.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Since we have Linux versions of OpenOffice packed as RPMs (e.g., for 
RedHat) as well as DEBs (e.g., for Ubuntu), we can look for trends in the ratio 
of requests for these two packaging formats over time:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="packaging.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/f5304e3b-e508-4112-9ae2-6cbfdb55a890"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="packaging.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Also, we have 32-bit and 64-bit Linux downloads, and we see a gradual 
increase in demand over time for the 64-bit version, now reaching 
50%.&amp;nbsp; (The drop in July-September is not fully explained, but may have 
been an error in our download page that was not recommending 64-bit downloads 
appropriately.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="64-bit.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/ee577c6b-74ca-472a-b698-b8488748e0dd"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt; &lt;img alt="64-bit.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Although we don't have detailed download data for different Windows 
versions (we have a single download for all Windows users) we do have 
information from website visitors (nearly 7 million visitors per month) that 
tells a similar story.&amp;nbsp; Windows 7 remains the most popular Windows 
version for our users, accounting for over half of Windows visitors.&amp;nbsp; 
Windows XP ties with Windows 8 for second place, though Windows XP usage is 
declining quickly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/f757dc34-3085-4446-8fd7-d339b762f591"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Looking at the similar data for web browsers, we see the rise in 
Chrome users among our website visitors:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="browsers.png" 
src="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/fbeef3f1-467b-46ec-bfda-355187d97d39"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img alt="browsers.png" 
src="../images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
 &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;The above charts were made in &lt;a 
href="http://www.r-project.org/"&gt;R&lt;/a&gt;, using data from &lt;a 
href="http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Download%20Stats%20API/"&gt;SourceForge's
 REST API&lt;/a&gt; and from Google Analytics.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The 
processing of the SourceForge data was automated via a &lt;a 
href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/detail-by-day.py"&gt;custom
 Python script&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..847154a
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_64-bit.png differ
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..57a0a3c
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_browsers.png differ
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d459ac6
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_day.png differ
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..83cf36c
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_languages.png differ
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..15cb103
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_os-downloads.png differ
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..847154a
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_packaging.png differ
diff --git a/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..060faee
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/output/images/blog/75_million_downloads_of_apache_windows.png differ

Reply via email to