alamb commented on code in PR #99: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/99#discussion_r1941347156
########## content/en/docs/File Format/implementationstatus.md: ########## @@ -13,94 +13,96 @@ implementations. The value in each box means: * ✅: supported * ❌: not supported +* (R/W): partial reader/writer only support * (blank) no data Implementations: * `C++`: [parquet-cpp](https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/main/cpp/src/parquet) * `Java`: [parquet-java](https://github.com/apache/parquet-java) * `Go`: [parquet-go](https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/tree/main/parquet) * `Rust`: [parquet-rs](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/main/parquet/README.md) +* `CUDA C++`: [cudf](https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf) Review Comment: I also recall that the idea here was to list library names (so this would be better as `cuDF`) not languages. It just so happens that we only had one example library for each language so there was (before this PR) a 1-1 correspondence. Does that make sense @mhaseeb123 ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
