platypii commented on code in PR #145: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/145#discussion_r2646204830
########## data/implementations/features/api-features.yaml: ########## @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ category_id: api-features features: - - id: api-external-column-data - display_name: External column data - note: "In parquet.thrift: ColumnChunk->file_path" + - id: api-parquet-summary-file + display_name: Parquet summary file + note: "Files named _metadata that consolidate footers from multiple parquet files." Review Comment: Is "parquet summary file" really the same as supporting `file_path`? Maybe summary files are the only known use case of actually using `file_path`? But nothing in the spec says file_path is necessarily associated with "summary files". In fact is there anything in the spec about summary file or is that just an implementation choice some people made? I'm not opposed to having a row for support of summary files, but that seems like a different question than `file_path` support? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
