csringhofer commented on PR #156: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/156#issuecomment-3879772177
>I tried to capture the suggestions on how to improve the status page in a ticket: Thanks, having a more detailed status page would be a great help for people who try to get an overview / looking for a reference implementation. >however, I don't think that is inconsistent with the message we are collectively trying to put out with this post (an overview of spatial types in Parquet and celebration of the significant progress we were able to make over the last year). >the implementation status will likely change over time, so such a statement will become outdated I see the point - probably there are many things where the implementations could be improved besides geography statistics, and it is not in the scope of the article to go into these. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
