xiangfu0 commented on PR #18668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/18668#issuecomment-4712226231

   Addressed the remaining update-path/compatibility-verifier notes in the 
rebased head `864cfa1221` while keeping the intentional hard-reject behavior:
   
   - Added 
`TableConfigsRestletResourceTest#testUpdateRejectsStoredLegacyFieldLevelEncodingType`,
 which seeds a legacy stored config and verifies a new-controller table-config 
update rejects field-level `encodingType` with the migration message.
   - Updated the top-level README to state that create/update validation 
rejects `fieldConfigList[].encodingType` and that existing configs must be 
migrated before submission.
   - Added a compatibility-verifier README note explaining why those fixtures 
intentionally keep field-level `encodingType`: they are submitted to the older 
controller before the upgrade, where 
`fieldConfigList[].indexes.forward.encodingType` is not understood. They are 
not examples for configs submitted to new controllers.
   
   Local validation:
   - `./mvnw -pl pinot-controller -am 
-Dtest=TableConfigsRestletResourceTest#testUpdateRejectsStoredLegacyFieldLevelEncodingType
 -Dsurefire.failIfNoSpecifiedTests=false test`
   - `./mvnw spotless:apply -pl pinot-controller`
   - `./mvnw license:format -pl pinot-controller`
   - `./mvnw checkstyle:check -pl pinot-controller`
   - `./mvnw license:check -pl pinot-controller`
   - `git diff --check`


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to