xiangfu0 commented on code in PR #20060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/20060#discussion_r4393098458


##########
pinot-plugins/pinot-input-format/pinot-parquet/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/plugin/inputformat/parquet/ParquetNativeRecordExtractor.java:
##########
@@ -149,6 +148,11 @@ private Object extractValue(Group from, int fieldIndex, 
Type fieldType, int inde
           return intValue;
         case INT64:
           long longValue = from.getLong(fieldIndex, index);
+          if (logicalTypeAnnotation instanceof 
LogicalTypeAnnotation.IntLogicalTypeAnnotation integerType
+              && integerType.getBitWidth() == 64 && !integerType.isSigned() && 
longValue < 0) {

Review Comment:
   Fixed in `bf1c342bc7`: removed UINT64 rejection and kept the previous signed 
`Long` bit pattern, so existing hashed-ID pipelines retain their behavior. No 
new strict-mode flag is introduced in this PR. Native and Avro file-backed 
tests agree on `Long.MIN_VALUE` and `-1L`, with scalar/nested/raw-mode 
coverage; all 51 focused cases and quality checks pass. The INT96 fixes remain 
independent of UINT64 policy.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to