siddharthteotia commented on a change in pull request #6710:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/6710#discussion_r605260402



##########
File path: 
pinot-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/common/utils/DataTable.java
##########
@@ -80,4 +85,87 @@
   double[] getDoubleArray(int rowId, int colId);
 
   String[] getStringArray(int rowId, int colId);
+
+  /* The MetadataKeys is used in V3, where we present metadata as 
Map<MetadataKeys, String>
+   * ATTENTION:
+   *  - Don't change existing keys.
+   *  - Don't remove existing keys.
+   *  - Always add new keys to the end.
+   *  Otherwise, backward compatibility will be broken.
+   */
+  enum MetadataKeys {

Review comment:
       Yes, we can argue both ways here but my preference would be enum with 
implicit ordinal as opposed to id based. I agree the latter gives more 
flexibility to the user but I don't think we need it. So a simple enum with 
ordinal as id along with clear javadoc highlighting the rules for updating the 
enum is preferable imo. 




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to