ankitsultana commented on PR #9423: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/9423#issuecomment-1251430281
> I'm not sure I fully understand your statement here. Pruning segments has nothing to do with table config changes. And in fact table config is already cached in broker, and there is a watcher in TableCache to listen the table config changes in ZK. For instance when a user changes the retention, it may take a while for the changes to be reflected in Broker segment pruners. @Jackie-Jiang: I think you mentioned that this scenario may cause an issue since Broker doesn't listen to table-config changes. Can you share those concerns here? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
