Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #10572: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10572#issuecomment-1505668507
> I think the redesign of dedup makes sense but it'll be a much larger and involved effort, and unlikely for @raghavgautam to take. I think it makes sense to start a separate effort of dedup V2, but in the meantime it's fine for the community to add features and make improvements over V1, assuming it'll take some time for V2 to be ready. My concern for the current dedup implementation is that it is not maintained properly (not production ready), and the bugfixes for upsert is not added to dedup. If we decide to keep V1, we want to first apply all the changes to upsert to dedup as well. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
