xiangfu0 commented on PR #11069: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/11069#issuecomment-1627647011
> Overall, it looks good to me. Thanks. I initially followed the same approach to fix the issue but later realized that we have another [task](https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/11003) for the same work and was looking can we cover the issue along with the redesign work. I think client side should also get all the tables then check if they are on the same tenants, then decide how to pick the broker tenant for query execution. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
