gortiz commented on PR #12375: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/12375#issuecomment-1930195504
Consider this a draft. We may need to think whether in V2 we want to keep this behavior or not. IMHO the fact that a timestamp _index_ creates these virtual fields *should not* be known by the customer. In case they want to use them they should use _minutes(ts)_ or _days(ts)_ in their SQL expressions. In case there is an index with that granularity, we can change the physical plan to use it. In case there is not, we just apply the operation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
