[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIRK-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15502817#comment-15502817
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIRK-63:
------------------------------------
Github user tellison commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/93#discussion_r79352002
--- Diff:
src/main/java/org/apache/pirk/responder/wideskies/ResponderDriver.java ---
@@ -49,83 +41,111 @@
public class ResponderDriver
{
private static final Logger logger =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(ResponderDriver.class);
+ // ClassNames to instantiate Platforms using the platform CLI
+ private final static String MAPREDUCE_LAUNCHER =
"org.apache.pirk.responder.wideskies.mapreduce.MapReduceResponderLauncher";
+ private final static String SPARK_LAUNCHER =
"org.apache.pirk.responder.wideskies.spark.SparkResponderLauncher";
+ private final static String SPARKSTREAMING_LAUNCHER =
"org.apache.pirk.responder.wideskies.spark.streaming.SparkStreamingResponderLauncher";
+ private final static String STANDALONE_LAUNCHER =
"org.apache.pirk.responder.wideskies.standalone.StandaloneResponderLauncher";
+ private final static String STORM_LAUNCHER =
"org.apache.pirk.responder.wideskies.storm.StormResponderLauncher";
--- End diff --
I'm confused by this, I though the goal of PIRK-63 was to avoid having to
change the ResponderDriver each time a new responder type is introduced?
> Generalize ResponderDriver to use accept a RespondLauncher class
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIRK-63
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIRK-63
> Project: PIRK
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Responder
> Affects Versions: 0.1.0
> Reporter: DarinJ
> Assignee: DarinJ
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.0.1
>
>
> Currently as discussed on the mailing list, the ResponderDriver uses a switch
> statement based off a string in the CLI or properties file to determine the
> framework to launch. This is require a code change to the ResponderDriver
> for every framework added.
> The solution is to create a ResponderLauncher Interface which each framework
> overrides.
> {quote}
> public interface ResponderLauncher {
> public run()
> }
> {quote}
> To do this, we the change the string specifying the framework to the name of
> the class implementing ResponderLauncher i.e. SparkResponderLauncher and
> instantiate via reflection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)