rdhabalia commented on a change in pull request #2981: Allow subscribers to
access subscription admin-api
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/2981#discussion_r233665328
##########
File path:
pulsar-broker-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/authorization/AuthorizationProvider.java
##########
@@ -71,6 +71,18 @@
CompletableFuture<Boolean> canConsumeAsync(TopicName topicName, String
role,
AuthenticationDataSource authenticationData, String subscription);
+ /**
+ * Returns authorized roles that can access admin-api for given
subscription
+ *
+ * @param topicName
+ * the fully qualified topic name associated with the topic.
+ * @param subscription
+ * the subscription name defined by the client
+ * @return
+ */
+ CompletableFuture<Set<String>> getAuthorizedRolesOnSubscription(TopicName
topicName,
Review comment:
> If a use has consume access to some topic (on all the subscriptions) than
it can "mess up" some other consumer by attaching to the wrong subscription and
stealing someone else's messages.
which is already incorrect. right? we should have a way to prevent this and
with this PR it can be possible. But by default we can't enforce Per-Sub for
consumers as it can create issue for existing topics. But may be pulsar can
have a flag to enforce it in the system.
> I don't see admin api permissions as different from "consume" permissions.
Actually then we don't need this PR at all. No need of introducing
"Per-Subscription" authorization if "Namespace-auth(consume)" is anyway present
so, "Namespace-auth" will always win and all subscribers can access each
other's cursor state.
So, I thought admin-api right now doesn't have any authorization present, we
can make it right atleast for admin-api by enforcing "Per-Subscription"
validation.
But Let me know if you still think admin-api should not enforce
"Per-subscription" then I will make your suggested change and all api will use
one `canConsume()-api`.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services