eolivelli commented on code in PR #14971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14971#discussion_r867355251


##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/loadbalance/ModularLoadManagerStrategy.java:
##########
@@ -55,11 +58,17 @@ Optional<String> selectBroker(Set<String> candidates, 
BundleData bundleToAssign,
      */
     static ModularLoadManagerStrategy create(final ServiceConfiguration conf) {
         try {
-            // Only one strategy at the moment.
-            return new LeastLongTermMessageRate(conf);
+            Class<?> loadManagerStrategyClass = 
Class.forName(conf.getLoadBalancerLoadManagerStrategy());
+            Object loadManagerStrategyInstance = 
loadManagerStrategyClass.newInstance();
+            if (loadManagerStrategyInstance instanceof 
ModularLoadManagerStrategy) {
+                return (ModularLoadManagerStrategy) 
loadManagerStrategyInstance;
+            } else {
+                LOG.error("create load manager strategy failed. using 
LeastLongTermMessageRate instead.");

Review Comment:
   please throw a error, otherwise the system will behave in a way that is 
unespected



##########
conf/broker.conf:
##########
@@ -1144,6 +1144,10 @@ defaultNamespaceBundleSplitAlgorithm=range_equally_divide
 # load shedding strategy, support OverloadShedder and ThresholdShedder, 
default is ThresholdShedder since 2.10.0
 
loadBalancerLoadSheddingStrategy=org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.impl.ThresholdShedder
 
+# load balance load manager strategy, support LeastLongTermMessageRate and 
ThresholdLoadManagerStrategy,
+# default is LeastLongTermMessageRate
+loadBalancerLoadManagerStrategy=org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.impl.LeastLongTermMessageRate

Review Comment:
   I wonder if it is better to let the user only configure the classname 
without the package name, this way we will prevent users to load non-standard 
classes.
   ```
   loadBalancerLoadManagerStrategy=LeastLongTermMessageRate
   loadBalancerLoadManagerStrategy= ThresholdLoadManagerStrategy
   ```
   
   That would be to add a new API/public extensions point, like Protocol 
Handlers (and in this case we will require a PIP and a deeper discussion)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to