zbentley commented on issue #11845: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/11845#issuecomment-1182341154
I think that still may result in issues, though. What if the library-global logger factory is configured to wrap a logger object whose lifecycle is not bound to the library--like a Python logger, which may need to be mutated, created, destroyed etc., between constructions of `Client`? Wouldn't that result in issues like this one? In other words, I think a library-global logger is not a good idea so long as we support passing in logger objects from Python. I think the two are mutually exclusive (if you don't want bugs/weird behavior that is). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
