lhotari commented on issue #16439: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16439#issuecomment-1182832309
> Abandoned workflows should be hidden and the same workflow should be combined together to make the list looks clearer and tidy. @Anonymitaet It seems that the priority of this work item should be low since it's only about making the "list look clearer and tidy". Why does it matter? It would be good to have a better rationale for implementing this. We might be fine with the 400 day retention policy that is now the default in GitHub. There's more context about this in my comment on the PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16539#issuecomment-1182821007 . The reason why I have been deleting old workflow runs is that it has been causing issues to our CI when there have been so many old workflow runs. there used to be over 550000 archived runs and that might have caused the search index to get corrupted in the GH backend a few times. When the search index got corrupted, the UI would display a warning "We are having problems searching workflow runs. The results may not be complete.". This problem has gone away after contacting GH support (and they rebuilt the search index) and after deleting old runs to reduce the number of runs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
