TakaHiR07 commented on code in PR #16792:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16792#discussion_r962454929
##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/PersistentTopicsBase.java:
##########
@@ -271,6 +271,24 @@ protected CompletableFuture<Map<String, Set<AuthAction>>>
internalGetPermissions
}
}
}
+
+ // If topic is partitioned, add based topic permission
+ if (topicName.isPartitioned() &&
auth.getTopicAuthentication().containsKey(
+ topicName.getPartitionedTopicName())) {
+ for (Map.Entry<String, Set<AuthAction>> entry :
+
auth.getTopicAuthentication().get(topicName.getPartitionedTopicName()).entrySet())
{
+ String role = entry.getKey();
+ Set<AuthAction> topicPermissions = entry.getValue();
+
+ if (!permissions.containsKey(role)) {
+ permissions.put(role, topicPermissions);
+ } else {
+ // Do the union between namespace and topic level
+ Set<AuthAction> union =
Sets.union(permissions.get(role), topicPermissions);
+ permissions.put(role, union);
+ }
+ }
+ }
Review Comment:
The implementation of grant is in AuthorizationProvider, while get/revoke
implementation is in persistentTopicsBase.
Is it better to provide the get/revoke permission method in
AuthorizationProvider?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
