flowchartsman opened a new issue, #18213: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18213
### Search before asking - [X] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues) and found nothing similar. ### Version If it is possible, could #14814 be cherry-picked to 2.8? I tried applying the change to the 2.8 branch, and aside from a minor conflict on import ordering, it looks as if it would apply cleanly. This would allow 2.8 to run pulsar functions from the package manager. ### Minimal reproduce step Attempt to deploy pulsar function from package management. ### What did you expect to see? Success. ### What did you see instead? In the logs: ``` 2022-03-23T07:00:52,589+0000 [worker-scheduler-0] ERROR org.apache.pulsar.functions.worker.FunctionActioner - public/default/1ib0g63yjm6hw Error starting function org.apache.distributedlog.exceptions.InvalidStreamNameException: Invalid stream name : 'Invalid log name "/function://public/default/[email protected]" caused by empty node name specified @11' at org.apache.dist… ``` ### Anything else? _No response_ ### Are you willing to submit a PR? - [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
