KannarFr commented on PR #17411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17411#issuecomment-1515125158

   > Perhaps we can introduce an additional check that calls the authorization 
service and then we'll implement the default PulsarAuthorizationProvider in 
such a way that there are no breaking change
   
   This LGTM. Can you drive this discussion on the ML? Shall I do it?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to