michaeljmarshall commented on PR #17411: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/17411#issuecomment-1515484648
> > Perhaps we can introduce an additional check that calls the authorization service and then we'll implement the default PulsarAuthorizationProvider in such a way that there are no breaking change > > This LGTM. Can you drive this discussion on the ML if you think it's required? Shall I do it? I won't be able to drive this discussion. Let me know if you have any questions though. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
