lhotari commented on PR #20514: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20514#issuecomment-1579978506
> > IMO, We should consider a new way to handle the system topic because we do a lot of similar logic to filter system topics. :( > > Not only the entry filter but also some policies etc. > > I was mentioning the same thing to @lhotari earlier today. This is one reason I have pushed for a more formal definition of system topics on the ML over the past two years. > > At the moment, their design feels very accidental instead of intentional. System topics continue to get more exceptions, and we continue to add dependencies upon the system topic concept. > > Maybe we should restart a discussion on this topic. @mattisonchao @michaeljmarshall +1. Yes, it would be good to restart it. In KOP there are topics like `__transaction_state` and `__consumer_offsets`. These don't seem to be system topics from Pulsar's perspective at the moment. That's another example of more exceptions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
