tisonkun commented on PR #20560: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20560#issuecomment-1596364908
> Should we add pip under the scope section? You might also need to fix typos in the pip, and improve the pip to make it easy to read. > > Now the `type` looks like `actions`. Maybe we can consider adding `create` under the type section, it will work for any documentation changes. E.g. create a document, improve a document, fix a bug, refactor the document or code, create a pip, fix the pip. > > cc @Anonymitaet @tisonkun WDYT? Originally I suggest a conventional commit like spec so that we don't reinvent all these concepts. In conventional commit spec PIPs can be regarded as `docs` since they are design docs. Scopes, IMO, need not to be required but at the author preference. Unless we make use of that field, it won't be valuable. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
