JooHyukKim commented on PR #20691: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20691#issuecomment-1619669245
> Would you share your thoughts why it should be a PIP? Generally a PIP takes long time to proceed and we don't need it unless necessary. I see, probably that's why PIP was not quite responsive as I expected. I thought about it, too. Whether this was PIP-sort of thing. As [pip introduction](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pip) mentions, specifically [🔗 at this part](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pip#:~:text=large%20code%20refactoring%2C), large code refactoring may need PIP also. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
