poorbarcode commented on PR #21144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21144#issuecomment-1711250874

   > Some how, it looks like related to this change 
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12846?
   
   No, the PR https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12846 just added a field 
`epoch` and renamed `equals` to `isSuccessorTo`.
   
   > Why not just fix the isSuccessorTo method?
   
   In our design, we assume that the io events are sequential. But one 
producer/consumer can use different connections, making the sequential broken. 
I think the current solution is better.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to