zzzming opened a new pull request, #1099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pull/1099

   Fixes #1098 
   
   ### Motivation
   
   panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
   [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x40 pc=0x8a8eaa]
   
   goroutine 1 [running]:
   
   
github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pulsar.(*partitionProducer).internalFlushCurrentBatch(0xc00c6ccc60)
        
/go/pkg/mod/github.com/apache/[email protected]/pulsar/producer_partition.go:869
 +0x2a
   
github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pulsar.(*partitionProducer).runEventsLoop(0xc00c6ccc60)
        
/go/pkg/mod/github.com/apache/[email protected]/pulsar/producer_partition.go:457
 +0x1d7
   created by github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pulsar.newPartitionProducer in 
goroutine 5713
        
/go/pkg/mod/github.com/apache/[email protected]/pulsar/producer_partition.go:203
 +0x9bb
   when the producer option set to DisableBatching: true, the time.ticker wil 
be created and close after a while, when ticker.Stop() over 10ms (default 
value) since created it will cause the ticker still tick, and cause nil pointer 
dereference eventually.
   
   ### Modifications
   
   Add one more check to evaluate if `batchBuilder` is nil, in non-batch 
scenario, it should return immediate. 
   
   To understand the behaviour of ticker, write a small test code of ticker 
that ticker.C (the timer) sometime is called while the Stop() is called. That's 
why it's good to check the batchBuilder. If the batchBuilder object fails to be 
created, it should be caught at [line 294 at 
producer_partition.go](https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/blob/master/pulsar/producer_partition.go#L294).
 So if batch is enabled, it should not be nil. Therefore we can use the nil 
check to stop any non-batch calls to proceed with the flush.
   
   ### Verifying this change
   
   - [x] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   *If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes*
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): ( no)
     - The public API: ( no)
     - The schema: (no )
     - The default values of configurations: (no)
     - The wire protocol: (no)
   
   ### Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)
     - If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
     - If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup 
issue for adding the documentation
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to