tisonkun commented on code in PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/720#discussion_r1384473394
##########
data/broker-features.js:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+export default [
+ {
+ feature: "Produce / Exclusive",
+ stableSince: "2.2.0",
+ document: [
+ {
+ "text": "Concept",
+ "link": "concepts-clients/#access-mode",
+ },
+ ],
+ },
+ {
+ feature: "Produce / Shared",
+ stableSince: "2.2.0",
+ document: [
+ {
+ "text": "Concept",
+ "link": "concepts-clients/#access-mode",
+ },
+ ],
+ },
+ {
+ feature: "Subscription / Exclusive",
+ experimentalSince: "",
+ betaSince: "",
+ stableSince: "2.2.0",
+ document: [
+ {
+ "text": "Concept",
+ "link": "concepts-messaging/#exclusive",
+ },
+ ],
+ },
+ {
+ feature: "Subscription / Failover",
+ experimentalSince: "",
+ betaSince: "",
+ stableSince: "2.2.0",
+ document: [
+ {
+ "text": "Concept",
+ "link": "concepts-messaging/#failover",
+ },
+ ],
+ },
+ {
+ feature: "Subscription / Shared",
+ experimentalSince: "",
+ betaSince: "",
+ stableSince: "2.2.0",
+ document: [
+ {
+ "text": "Concept",
+ "link": "concepts-messaging/#shared",
+ },
+ ],
+ },
+ {
+ feature: "Subscription / KeyShared",
+ experimentalSince: "",
+ betaSince: "",
+ stableSince: "",
Review Comment:
@Jason918 I will use this patch release but I understand your concern that
from a user point of view we need a `x.0` stable version so that we're sure
that all versions after that should be stable.
@codelipenghui for example, 2.9.5 is stable, but what if 2.10.0? I guess
that the significant patch landed on 2.9.5 is not included in 2.10.0.
Anyway, we can use a pattern like `2.9.5/2.10.<n>/2.11.0 or later`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]