lburgazzoli commented on PR #21975: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21975#issuecomment-1928993883
> I would like to provide an SPI where submodules can be implemented using [wasmtime-java](https://github.com/kawamuray/wasmtime-java) and [chicory](https://github.com/dylibso/chicory) respectively :) > I'm not sure hot that would really be feasible given the low level APIs the various runtime expose, but if you come up with something I can definitively try it out and help with the chicory implementation. > About pulsar-function-wasm-sdk, do we need implement similar SDKs for other languages? Of course, except for the existing SDK in pulsar functions. > > Then when a language is not supported by pulsar functions, we can quickly provide a lightweight implementation of pulsar functions sdk. When there is more time, we can continue to support the complete SDK. > > I think this is a good idea, do you have any other suggestions? @lburgazzoli Given the current state of Wasm, an SDK is likely very needed otherwise each function would be required to re-implement the ABI. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
