lburgazzoli commented on PR #21992: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21992#issuecomment-1988554829
> Before adding a new type for Pulsar Functions, I'd rather have Pulsar Functions support pluggable runtimes so that anyone could implement a new runtime time such as WASM support. It's referenced in my reply to the dev mailing list: https://lists.apache.org/thread/cqshs3h1cxn8o4yh38p3zslymfl8wgdn . The "Pluggable Pulsar Functions runtime" thread is https://lists.apache.org/thread/hcnpytky4bg4fd1xh1p4pbqbjxbv9rdg . I fully support adding support for WASM, but after adding pluggable Pulsar Functions runtime. The reason for this is that the Pulsar Functions code base is already very cluttered and there would be a benefit to make adding new runtime types possible without adding each type one-by-one making the code base even worse than it is today. +1 I'm quite new to Pulsar, but reading through the mailing list, is seems that It would also probably help to have a optimized support for the function type which for WASM would probably be very useful. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
