thetumbled commented on PR #22274:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22274#issuecomment-2002778266

   > I provided my feedback on the mailing list 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/xdq62jytxxj421vly6qzn9dn8vvjqyv1
   > 
   > > Before making this change, I hope that there could be discussion about
   > > improving the configuration solution in Pulsar.
   > > The mailing list thread is
   > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8splwyrn25pt5rb6ph0yz0tfgknn3hqh .
   > > With a proper configuration library such as Gestalt Config [1], it's
   > > possible to have a solution that is expressed in this PIP-346.
   > > In Gestalt Config, the feature "Merge Multiple Sources: Seamlessly
   > > merge configurations from different sources to create comprehensive
   > > settings." support this.
   > > This is the reason why I don't think that we should move forward with
   > > PIP-346 without addressing the proposal in the other mailing list
   > > thread
   > > "[DISCUSSION] Proposal to Replace Pulsar's Homegrown Configuration
   > > Framework with Gestalt Config" [2].
   > > -Lari
   > > 1 - https://github.com/gestalt-config/gestalt#features
   > > 2 - https://lists.apache.org/thread/8splwyrn25pt5rb6ph0yz0tfgknn3hqh
   
   Based on my understanding, this new lib can merge multiple configuration 
file with some file having higher priority. 
   
   > I provided my feedback on the mailing list 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/xdq62jytxxj421vly6qzn9dn8vvjqyv1
   > 
   > > Before making this change, I hope that there could be discussion about
   > > improving the configuration solution in Pulsar.
   > > The mailing list thread is
   > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8splwyrn25pt5rb6ph0yz0tfgknn3hqh .
   > > With a proper configuration library such as Gestalt Config [1], it's
   > > possible to have a solution that is expressed in this PIP-346.
   > > In Gestalt Config, the feature "Merge Multiple Sources: Seamlessly
   > > merge configurations from different sources to create comprehensive
   > > settings." support this.
   > > This is the reason why I don't think that we should move forward with
   > > PIP-346 without addressing the proposal in the other mailing list
   > > thread
   > > "[DISCUSSION] Proposal to Replace Pulsar's Homegrown Configuration
   > > Framework with Gestalt Config" [2].
   > > -Lari
   > > 1 - https://github.com/gestalt-config/gestalt#features
   > > 2 - https://lists.apache.org/thread/8splwyrn25pt5rb6ph0yz0tfgknn3hqh
   
   Not mastering to use mail list to reply, i have better reply you here.😂
   
   Hi Lari,
     Based on my understanding, this new lib can merge multiple configuration 
file with some file having higher priority, which is a nice feature as this pip 
try to introduce another simplified configuration file.
     But i wonder why we can't move forward with PIP-346 without introducing 
Gestalt. Whether introducing Gestalt or not, we will introduce a new simplified 
configuration file. I don't get why we should block this PIP?
   
   Regards,
   thetumbled.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to