yyj8 opened a new pull request, #23021:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23021

   …readOnlyBookieInfo cache update fail causing broker to misjudge that the 
bookie is unavailable.
   
   <!--
   ### Contribution Checklist
     
     - PR title format should be *[type][component] summary*. For details, see 
*[Guideline - Pulsar PR Naming 
Convention](https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/develop-semantic-title/)*. 
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   -->
   
   <!-- Either this PR fixes an issue, -->
   
   Fixes #23020 
   
   <!-- or this PR is one task of an issue -->
   
   Main Issue: #xyz
   
   <!-- If the PR belongs to a PIP, please add the PIP link here -->
   
   PIP: #xyz 
   
   <!-- Details of when a PIP is required and how the PIP process work, please 
see: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pip/README.md -->
   
   ### Motivation
   The bookie process is running normally and there is corresponding bookie 
information in the metadata.   Therefore, the broker's cache should also have 
corresponding bookie information.  But the broker's cache does not have 
corresponding bookie information and causing broker to misjudge that the bookie 
is unavailable.
   
   The broker prints the following exception information:
   
   ```
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,569+0800 [pulsar-io-18-1] INFO  
org.apache.pulsar.broker.service.ServerCnx - 
[/10.172.240.12:54152][persistent://public/default/writeCKDeadLetter-partition-0]
 Creating producer. producerId=1
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,569+0800 [pulsar-io-18-1] INFO  
org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerImpl - Opening managed ledger 
public/default/persistent/writeCKDeadLetter-partition-0
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,570+0800 [main-EventThread] INFO  
org.apache.bookkeeper.client.DefaultBookieAddressResolver - Cannot resolve 
127.0.0.1:3181, bookie is unknown 
org.apache.bookkeeper.client.BKException$BKBookieHandleNotAvailableException: 
Bookie handle is not available
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,570+0800 [main-EventThread] ERROR 
org.apache.bookkeeper.proto.PerChannelBookieClient - Cannot connect to 
127.0.0.1:3181 as endpoint resolution failed (probably bookie is down) err 
org.apache.bookkeeper.proto.BookieAddressResolver$BookieIdNotResolvedException: 
Cannot resolve bookieId 127.0.0.1:3181, bookie does not exist or it is not 
running
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,570+0800 [BookKeeperClientWorker-OrderedExecutor-0-0] 
ERROR org.apache.bookkeeper.client.ReadLastConfirmedOp - While 
readLastConfirmed ledger: 31003 did not hear success responses from all 
quorums, QuorumCoverage(e:1,w:1,a:1) = [-8]
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,570+0800 [BookKeeperClientWorker-OrderedExecutor-0-0] 
ERROR org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerImpl - 
[public/default/persistent/writeCKDeadLetter-partition-0] Failed to open ledger 
31003: Error while recovering ledger
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,570+0800 [BookKeeperClientWorker-OrderedExecutor-0-0] 
ERROR org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl - 
[public/default/persistent/writeCKDeadLetter-partition-0] Failed to initialize 
managed ledger: Error while recovering ledger
   2024-06-11T12:26:24,570+0800 [BookKeeperClientWorker-OrderedExecutor-0-0] 
INFO  org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerImpl - 
[public/default/persistent/writeCKDeadLetter-partition-0] Closing managed ledger
   ```
   
   <!-- Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is 
the problem you're trying to solve. -->
   
   ### Modifications
   
   <!-- Describe the modifications you've done. -->
   
   ### Verifying this change
   
   - [ ] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
   
   *(Please pick either of the following options)*
   
   This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe 
tests)*.
   
   *(or)*
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   *(example:)*
     - *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads 
(10MB)*
     - *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure*
   
   ### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
   <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
   
   *If the box was checked, please highlight the changes*
   
   - [ ] Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
   - [ ] The public API
   - [ ] The schema
   - [ ] The default values of configurations
   - [ ] The threading model
   - [ ] The binary protocol
   - [ ] The REST endpoints
   - [ ] The admin CLI options
   - [ ] The metrics
   - [ ] Anything that affects deployment
   
   ### Documentation
   
   <!-- DO NOT REMOVE THIS SECTION. CHECK THE PROPER BOX ONLY. -->
   
   - [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes. -->
   - [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update 
later -->
   - [ ] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
   - [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->
   
   ### Matching PR in forked repository
   
   PR in forked repository: <!-- ENTER URL HERE -->
   
   <!--
   After opening this PR, the build in apache/pulsar will fail and instructions 
will
   be provided for opening a PR in the PR author's forked repository.
   
   apache/pulsar pull requests should be first tested in your own fork since 
the 
   apache/pulsar CI based on GitHub Actions has constrained resources and quota.
   GitHub Actions provides separate quota for pull requests that are executed 
in 
   a forked repository.
   
   The tests will be run in the forked repository until all PR review comments 
have
   been handled, the tests pass and the PR is approved by a reviewer.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to