poorbarcode commented on code in PR #23052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23052#discussion_r1684161645


##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/BrokerService.java:
##########
@@ -625,6 +625,16 @@ public void start() throws Exception {
         this.updateBrokerDispatchThrottlingMaxRate();
         this.startCheckReplicationPolicies();
         this.startDeduplicationSnapshotMonitor();
+        this.startClearInvalidateTopicNameCacheTask();
+    }
+
+    protected void startClearInvalidateTopicNameCacheTask() {
+        final int maxSecondsToClearTopicNameCache = 
pulsar.getConfiguration().getMaxSecondsToClearTopicNameCache();
+        inactivityMonitor.scheduleAtFixedRate(
+            () -> 
TopicName.clearIfReachedMaxCapacity(pulsar.getConfiguration().getTopicNameCacheCaxCapacity()),
+            maxSecondsToClearTopicNameCache,
+            maxSecondsToClearTopicNameCache,
+            TimeUnit.SECONDS);

Review Comment:
   > This solution doesn't seem effective when the cache size can go over 
limits. I think it's better to use Caffeine cache with max size (as a LRU 
cache). You could remove expiration when using Caffeine if that's expensive.
   
   - Clearing cache is just for the topic that was deleted, if it was not 
deleted, leaving it in the memory is better.
   - Once there are too many topics in use, Caffeine will trigger queue items 
switching, which will cause more CPU costs.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to