lhotari commented on code in PR #23152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23152#discussion_r1718584441
##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/loadbalance/extensions/channel/ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.java:
##########
@@ -325,6 +325,16 @@ public synchronized void start() throws
PulsarServerException {
ServiceUnitStateCompactionStrategy.class.getName()))
.create();
tableview.listen((key, value) -> handle(key, value));
+ tableview.forEach((serviceUnit, data) -> {
+ if (debug) {
+ log.info("Loaded the service unit state data. serviceUnit:
{}, data: {}", serviceUnit, data);
+ }
+ ServiceUnitState state = state(data);
+ if (state.equals(Owned) && isTargetBroker(data.dstBroker())) {
+ pulsar.getNamespaceService()
+
.onNamespaceBundleOwned(LoadManagerShared.getNamespaceBundle(pulsar,
serviceUnit));
+ }
+ });
Review Comment:
The main reason why I'm resisting the change is that it's currently not
symmetric. The `.listen` case uses a method `handle` and the `.forEach` case
uses an anonymous function. It feels that it should be symmetric so that both
are handled with methods. This isn't a critical issue, but rather a guidance.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
