dlg99 opened a new issue, #24490:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/24490

   ### Search before reporting
   
   - [x] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues) 
and found nothing similar.
   
   
   ### Read release policy
   
   - [x] I understand that [unsupported 
versions](https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/#supported-versions)
 don't get bug fixes. I will attempt to reproduce the issue on a supported 
version of Pulsar client and Pulsar broker.
   
   
   ### User environment
   
   Pulsar 4.0.x
   
   ### Issue Description
   
   After running series of perf tests to compare 3.0.x and 4.0.x we noticed 
~15% e2e (from the time message produced to the time message consumed) avg 
latency increase in the tests that use shared subscription.
   
   The regression disappeared after we set 
   ```
   subscriptionKeySharedUseClassicPersistentImplementation=true 
   subscriptionSharedUseClassicPersistentImplementation=true
   ```
   
   This makes recent-ish refactoring (PIP-379 ) of shared/keyshared 
subscription the primary suspect.
   @lhotari FYI
   
   ### Error messages
   
   ```text
   
   ```
   
   ### Reproducing the issue
   
   Test names give rough description of what's being tested:
   
   - Pulsar 1m 10 topics 3 partitions 100b shared subs
   - Pulsar 400k 10 topics 3 partitions 1k shared subs
   
   
   @sandeep-mst can help with repro if needed
   
   ### Additional information
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit a PR?
   
   - [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to