chrisqwang3 commented on code in PR #24625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24625#discussion_r2288989546


##########
pip/pip-437.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+# PIP-437: Granular and Fixed-Delay Policies for Message Delivery
+
+# Background
+Pulsar's delayed delivery feature allows producers to schedule messages to be 
delivered at a future time. To provide administrative control and prevent 
abuse, **PIP-315** introduced a `maxDeliveryDelayInMillis` policy.
+While this provides an important safeguard by setting an *upper bound*, it 
does not address all administrative needs. There is currently no way to enforce 
a *specific, non-overridable* delay for all messages on a topic.
+
+# Motivation
+The current system lacks administrative controls on message delivery delays, 
which introduces risks to cluster stability and data integrity.
+
+## Risks in the current system:
+Unbounded Resource Pressure: Excessively delayed messages must be retained in 
storage for extended periods.
+More importantly, they create a long-lived state in the broker's memory that 
cannot be cleared,
+leading to unpredictable resource consumption and potential garbage collection 
pressure
+
+### The Limitation:
+To protect broker memory, this tracker is capped at a configurable fixed 
number of entries (e.g., 10,000).
+A large volume of messages with widely varying delivery times can easily 
exhaust this capacity.
+Once the tracker is full, it stops persisting the index for new delayed 
messages, retaining this state only in memory.
+If the broker restarts for any reason (e.g., crash, rolling upgrade), this 
volatile in-memory state is completely lost.
+
+### The Impact: Upon restart, the broker's only source of truth is the last 
persisted cursor position.
+This position does not account for the lost tracking information, forcing the 
broker to re-dispatch messages that were already processed.
+This results in significant and difficult-to-predict message duplication for 
downstream consumers.
+
+The lack of administrative controls on message delivery delays introduces 
critical risks to cluster stability and data integrity.
+This proposal aims to provide granular control at the topic and namespace 
levels to add a new fixed delay delivery configuration: 
+
+1. **Prevent Message Duplication:**  By forcing all messages on a topic to 
have the exact same delay,it prevents the delayed message tracker from becoming 
overwhelmed and eliminates the risk of message duplication upon broker restart, 
leading to a more stable and predictable system.
+2. **Enforcing Compliance and Business Rules:** Certain workflows may require 
certain control that require the enforcement at the broker level
+3.  **Simplifying Producer Configuration:** By setting a fixed delay on the 
topic, the responsibility for managing the delay logic is shifted from the 
client to the broker, reducing the risk of client-side misconfiguration.
+
+# Goals
+## In Scope
+-   Introduce a new `fixed-delivery-delay` policy, configurable at the 
namespace and topic levels, to enforce a mandatory delivery delay.
+-   Enhance the existing `/delayedDelivery` admin API endpoints and 
`pulsar-admin` commands to manage both the existing `maxDeliveryDelayInMillis` 
and the new `fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis` policies within the same policy group.
+-   Ensure the `fixed-delivery-delay` policy takes precedence over any 
client-specified delay and the existing `max-delivery-delay` policy.
+
+# High Level Design
+This proposal will enhance the existing `DelayedDeliveryPolicies` object to 
include a new `fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis` field.
+This new policy will follow Pulsar's standard hierarchical model, allowing it 
to be set at the namespace level and overridden at the topic level.
+The core logic will be implemented with the following precedence:
+
+1.  **If `fixed-delivery-delay` is set:** The broker will ignore any 
`deliverAt` time sent by the producer and will override it by calculating 
`publish_time + fixed_delay`. The `max-delivery-delay` policy is ignored.
+2.  **If `fixed-delivery-delay` is NOT set, but `max-delivery-delay` is:** The 
broker will validate the producer's requested `deliverAt` time against the 
`max-delivery-delay` policy, rejecting the message if it exceeds the limit.
+3.  **If neither policy is set:** The system behaves as it does today, 
honoring the client's requested `deliverAt` time, constrained only by the 
global broker-level setting.
+
+# Detailed Design
+## Design & Implementation Details
+
+1.  **Data Model Changes**:
+    *   Add a new `fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis` field to the 
`DelayedDeliveryPolicies.java` class. This class is already used for the 
existing `maxDeliveryDelayInMillis` policy.
+    *   Update `HierarchyTopicPolicies.java` to resolve the effective 
`fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis` for a topic, respecting the topic-over-namespace 
hierarchy.
+
+2.  **Enforcement Logic**:
+    *   The enforcement logic will be placed in `PersistentTopic.java` within 
the `publishMessage` and `publishTxnMessage` methods, right before the existing 
`isExceedMaximumDeliveryDelay` check.
+    *   This logic will modify the `MessageMetadata` of the incoming message 
*before* it is passed to the managed ledger for persistence.
+
+## Public-facing Changes
+### Public API
+#### Topic-Level Policies
+| Method   | Endpoint                                                          
        | Description                                                           
                                                                   |
+| :------- | 
:------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| `POST`   | 
`/admin/v2/persistent/{tenant}/{namespace}/{topic}/delayedDelivery`       | 
Sets or updates the delayed delivery policies for the topic.To disable a 
policy, a field can be set to `0`.                              |
+| `GET`    | 
`/admin/v2/persistent/{tenant}/{namespace}/{topic}/delayedDelivery`       | 
Gets the configured delayed delivery policies for the topic which optionally 
include the fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis if configured |
+
+#### Namespace-Level Policies
+| Method   | Endpoint                                                          
| Description                                                      |
+| :------- | :---------------------------------------------------------------- 
|:-----------------------------------------------------------------|
+| `POST`   | `/admin/v2/namespaces/{tenant}/{namespace}/delayedDelivery`       
| Sets or updates the delayed delivery policies for the namespace. To disable a 
policy, a field can be set to `0`.|
+| `GET`    | `/admin/v2/namespaces/{tenant}/{namespace}/delayedDelivery`       
| Gets the configured delayed delivery policies for the namespace which 
optionally include the fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis if configured  |
+
+### Binary protocol
+
+### Configuration
+
+### CLI
+*   The existing `set-delayed-delivery` command in `CmdTopicPolicies.java` and 
`CmdNamespaces.java` will be updated with a new optional parameter: 
`--fixed-delay` (or `-fd`).
+*   The REST endpoints under `/delayedDelivery` will be updated to accept and 
return the new `fixedDeliveryDelayInMillis` field in their JSON payload.
+
+### Metrics
+
+To provide visibility into the enforcement of the new policies, we will 
introduce a new counter metric.
+*   **Full Name**: `pulsar.broker.topic.messages.delayed.rejected`

Review Comment:
   updated 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to