lhotari commented on code in PR #24730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24730#discussion_r2342192375


##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/HashRangeExclusiveStickyKeyConsumerSelector.java:
##########
@@ -143,34 +153,38 @@ private synchronized CompletableFuture<Void> 
validateKeySharedMeta(Consumer cons
         }
     }
 
-    private synchronized Consumer findConflictingConsumer(List<IntRange> 
ranges) {
-        for (IntRange intRange : ranges) {
-            Map.Entry<Integer, Consumer> ceilingEntry = 
rangeMap.ceilingEntry(intRange.getStart());
-            Map.Entry<Integer, Consumer> floorEntry = 
rangeMap.floorEntry(intRange.getEnd());
-
-            if (floorEntry != null && floorEntry.getKey() >= 
intRange.getStart()) {
-                return floorEntry.getValue();
-            }
-
-            if (ceilingEntry != null && ceilingEntry.getKey() <= 
intRange.getEnd()) {
-                return ceilingEntry.getValue();
+    private synchronized Consumer findConflictingConsumer(List<IntRange> 
newConsumerRanges) {
+        for (IntRange newRange : newConsumerRanges) {
+            // 1. Check for potential conflicts with existing ranges that 
start before newRange's start.
+            Map.Entry<Integer, Pair<Range, Consumer>> conflictBeforeStart = 
rangeMap.floorEntry(newRange.getStart());
+            if (conflictBeforeStart != null) {
+                Range existingRange = conflictBeforeStart.getValue().getLeft();
+                if (checkRangesOverlap(newRange, existingRange)) {
+                    return conflictBeforeStart.getValue().getRight();
+                }
             }
-
-            if (ceilingEntry != null && floorEntry != null && 
ceilingEntry.getValue().equals(floorEntry.getValue())) {
-                KeySharedMeta keySharedMeta = 
ceilingEntry.getValue().getKeySharedMeta();
-                for (IntRange range : keySharedMeta.getHashRangesList()) {
-                    int start = Math.max(intRange.getStart(), 
range.getStart());
-                    int end = Math.min(intRange.getEnd(), range.getEnd());
-                    if (end >= start) {
-                        return ceilingEntry.getValue();
-                    }
+            // 2. Check for potential conflicts with existing ranges that 
start after newRange's start.
+            Map.Entry<Integer, Pair<Range, Consumer>> conflictAfterStart = 
rangeMap.ceilingEntry(newRange.getStart());
+            if (conflictAfterStart != null) {
+                Range existingRange = conflictAfterStart.getValue().getLeft();
+                if (checkRangesOverlap(newRange, existingRange)) {
+                    return conflictAfterStart.getValue().getRight();
                 }
             }
         }
         return null;
     }
 
-    Map<Integer, Consumer> getRangeConsumer() {
+
+    private boolean checkRangesOverlap(IntRange range1, Range range2) {
+        return Math.max(range1.getStart(), range2.getStart()) <= 
Math.min(range1.getEnd(), range2.getEnd());

Review Comment:
   It shouldn't be allowed unless the old code behaved that way? I guess it 
would be useful to have a test for this and run it with the old implementation 
unless it's already tested.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to